i think we agree on this.
actually, my first definition don't describe which platforms it should
targets.
but yes flex definition includes the ability to target multple
platforms. And this goal will be greatly achived if it targets as much
playforms as possible.
But definition of flex should not include the means used to achieve
that. Thats why i dont link flex definition to any Adobe technology,
runtimes or AS.
and yes i agree that if flex achieve to be cross platform without Adobe
runtimes, it would be more safe for its future.
Le 16/11/2012 17:28, Omar Gonzalez a écrit :
"so you're not actually describing something that is under Apache Flex
control"
it would be the case if in fact i put Adobe runtimes in my definition of
flex, which i don't.
The thread has gotten too long with responses that are even longer for me
to get everything straight.
It sounded like you were including the ability to target multiple platforms
as part of the definition of Flex.
Ideally that would be a great goal to have, I would just prefer that in the
future of Flex that the capability to target multiple platforms would not
come from relying on Adobe's AIR technology if it could be achieved by
other comparable open source means.
-omar
