You know I just had a funny thought.

I wrote an asdoc documentor(from previous code I had from other projects) in about 1 week with the Falcon compiler and Velocity templates.


You see I already know this is the future or bust with Flex. How was I able to create a middle framework that analyzed the AS3 model that was created by the compiler? I knew the API of accessors and renderers.


I then turned the compiler's data structure into a HTML documentation view with a renderer framework I wrote that understood the AS3 dialect using an accessor framework.

Folks, I know this is all possible because I have already done it. (in a way)

The MXML compiler just adds a huge amount of new possibilities because you are dealing with the same semantics in the compilers model but it can be written declarative in MXML!

Mike


Quoting João Fernandes <joaopedromartinsfernan...@gmail.com>:

I have to agree with aYo and anyone is free to try to implement a similar
solution of iOS or other platform.


On 15 November 2012 11:31, aYo ~ <a...@binitie.com> wrote:

I agree with Mike again, I feel that the idea of creating an android bridge
does not conflict with cross platform compatibility. It gives the developer
an extra edge to a choice that already exists, re the ability to create an
android app in air. The edge would be the choice between an air apk or a
native droid one.
On Nov 15, 2012 11:09 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <apa...@teotigraphix.com>
wrote:

> BTW;
>
> I am having a REAL HARD time understanding why Android is different from
> the Flash Player, AIR etc.
>
> The only thing I am starting to get here is this project is still married
> to Adobe in a big way.
>
> It's a shame, I bring up an idea about bridging the Flex compiler to some
> other open-source project and I get the "your not inline with the
projects
> goals".
>
> What to keep giving Adobe and their Flash Player all the support and
hype,
> hey they have Stage3D now folks we must create a whole new framework that
> runs on it!?
>
> Is there any other Apache project that is so dependent on a proprietary
> technology like Flex is with the Flash Player?
>
> Mike
>
>
> Quoting Michael Schmalle <apa...@teotigraphix.com>:
>
>  Hey,
>>
>> Don't get me wrong here people, I always sound like an instigator
because
>> I love life to much to be tied down to a thought.
>>
>> Yes I read Carlos's thoughts on splitting the project and not being
>> "inline" with the project's "multi-deployment" goals. This is where
>> translation gets lost in email and culture I guess.
>>
>> Please re-read what I wrote about the Swiss Army knife analogy.
>>
>> All, I am not a corporation nor an huge entity that could create this
>> mammoth run everywhere dream you hope of. I AM a developer that is very
>> into Android and see a bridge with this project. A use-case.
>>
>> So who is to say If I could with others help get this to work, that it
>> couldn't then be applied to other platforms?
>>
>> My strong emphasis on Android is to say, hey focus on the one
>> first(something that you are good at), get it right, perfect it and then
>> move to the many. That is all I am saying, how we get there is another
>> story.
>>
>>
>> Bertrand, your right with that comment about splitting communities. I
>> guess this is why I haven't brought this up because I disagree with the
>> main mission of the run everywhere majic this project is trying to
hold, I
>> think it's holding ti back.
>>
>> The truth is, If I got ostracized because of this idea I would just quit
>> and do all Android/Music like my original plan was, why even help
something
>> I don't use.
>>
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> Quoting Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org>:
>>
>>  On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Carlos Rovira
>>> <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com**> wrote:
>>>
>>>> ...My key points here is: whatever you want to do is up to you, but to
>>>> be part
>>>> of Apache Flex should be aligned with the main focus and goal of the
>>>> project. If you use the Falcon compiler to make something useful but
>>>> different, I think it could be a brand new project, that could have
>>>> sense
>>>> in its own....
>>>>
>>>
>>> Splitting projects usually splits communities as well - IMO some
>>> android-specific stuff could very well live in an "android" subfolder
>>> here.
>>>
>>> -Bertrand
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
>> http://www.teotigraphix.com
>> http://blog.teotigraphix.com
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
> http://www.teotigraphix.com
> http://blog.teotigraphix.com
>
>




--

João Fernandes


--
Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
http://www.teotigraphix.com
http://blog.teotigraphix.com

Reply via email to