Removing these lines from the source-package task :
<fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="crlf"
excludes="**/*.ttf,**/*.png"/>
<fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="unix"
excludes="**/*.ttf,**/*.png"/>
seems to have fixed this issue for both the zip and tar.gz source kits.
This would also fix the other issue raised on general@i.a.o about the
mismatch between eof eol in the src kit vs. release tag.
The question is - what are the other repercussions of this change?
Thanks,
Om
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Some folks seem to think that whatever source we release needs to also be
> in
> Apache SVN. For this file it isn't quite true. But yes, I agree that it
> doesn't affect functionality.
>
>
> On 11/7/12 12:51 PM, "Om" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl>
> wrote:
> >
> >> To be blunt: this "blocking issue" seems not to affect the
> functionality of
> >> the software in any way. So how can it be "blocking"?
> >>
> >> EdB
> >>
> >>
> > Alex raised the same exact question on general and we are awaiting an
> > answer. In the mean time, I am trying to figure out what caused this
> issue
> > and how we can solve it.
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Om <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> And to be fair, I went back and looked at all the Release Candiates
> till
> >>> date (RC1 through RC10) and the same mangled text problem in
> >>> installer/src/org/apache/flex/packageflexsdk/resource/RuntimeLocale.as
> >>> exists in all the source packages.
> >>>
> >>> I dont think we would have caught this issue even if the vote went on
> for
> >>> 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Om
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Om <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Here is the thread:
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> http://old.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-Apache-Flex-SDK-Installer-1.0.9-incubati
> >> ng-to34650778.html
> >>>>
> >>>> Its going on on gene...@incubator.apache.org. It would be good to
> >>>> subscribe to that list.
> >>>>
> >>>> Om
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> What potential blocker? I think I'm missing something...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> EdB
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 11/7/12 10:26 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Well, technically a -1 doesn't veto a release [1]. As long as
> >> there
> >>>>> are
> >>>>>>> more positive than negative votes, the release can go ahead. With
> >> no
> >>>>>>> changes to the code, and since the VOTE on this list passed last
> >>>>> time, it
> >>>>>>> was safe for Om to assume that the vote would pass again. IMHO he
> >>> was
> >>>>>> right
> >>>>>>> (in the spirit if not the letter of the rules) to expedite the
> >> VOTE
> >>> on
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>> IPMC list. We all want to release this and move on.
> >>>>>> True, but somewhere else it said that votes should take 72 hours.
> >> We
> >>>>> don't
> >>>>>> want to push on the overtaxed IPMC without having our house in
> >> order.
> >>>>> Now
> >>>>>> we have a potential blocker with the RuntimeLocale.as file and may
> >>> need
> >>>>> to
> >>>>>> withdraw again.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Alex Harui
> >>>>>> Flex SDK Team
> >>>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> >>>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> >>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
> >>>>>
> >>>>> T. 06-51952295
> >>>>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ix Multimedia Software
> >>
> >> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> >> 3521 VB Utrecht
> >>
> >> T. 06-51952295
> >> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
> >>
>
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>
>
