> How much of Adobe's LLVM based iOS AOT source is open? (if any) None, and I would bet that it will stay that way.
- Gordon -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Newman [mailto:capta...@unfocus.com] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 8:02 AM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: ASC 2.0 and Falcon On 10/18/12 7:28 PM, Gordon Smith wrote: > Yes, the community has to figure out what the essence of Flex really is. To > me, it's an rapid-development application framework, the combination of a > procedural language with a declarative language, and a widely-deployed > runtime that can support RIAs. The runtime of the future for RIAs seems to be > native code for mobile devices and HTML/Javascript for browser apps. The best > procedural language is anything that can be compiled to these runtimes. MXML > is a perfectly good declarative language for UIs. Maybe the real discussion should be less about supporting AVM3 and more about supporting a native compile framework - something like haXe NME maybe (already open source). How much of Adobe's LLVM based iOS AOT source is open? (if any) http://www.haxenme.org/ For Javascript, there's already Jangaroo (open source): http://www.jangaroo.net/home/ Kevin N.
