On Sep 10, 2012 10:32 PM, "Dave Fisher" <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: > > > On Sep 10, 2012, at 6:48 PM, Om wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: > > > >> > >> On Sep 8, 2012, at 4:15 PM, Om wrote: > >> > >>> On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi Om, > >>>> > >>>> > >> I can confirm that both of the source code releases are signed by you. > >> > >> > > Dave, > > > > Can you please clarify if that is a +1 vote? > > It is not a VOTE at all. I agree with Bertrand that both of your signatures should be in the KEYS file on dist. Carol should be able to help. > > Sorry you may need an RC3. > > FYI - I did manually verify that license headers are present in the source and the LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER look good. > > Thanks for your hard work here, this is a vary cool approach. > > Regards, > Dave > >
I don't mind cutting a new release candidate, but I am not sure how RC3 would be different from RC2. The KEYS would be updated on the site. Why a new RC? Thanks, Om > > > > Thanks, > > Om >
