On Wednesday, August 15, 2012, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi Carlos, > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Carlos Rovira > <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > > ...the problem is not about tooling. Is about the things we plan to do. > The > > revision and transformation of the core at flex... > > I guess that's where the disconnect is, I hear you and others saying > "we plan to do big things" but I see just small things (besides code > donations) happen at [1]. If you or others can show concrete examples > (i.e. code) of those big things that are impossible to do with svn > that might help change your mentors' opinions. And in the meantime, > there's probably lots of small to medium things to do to improve Flex > anyway. > > > ...If there's a development > > model based on SVN chaos, nobody will spend an hour to make it happen... > > Nobody said svn chaos...there are some serious projects like Hadoop, > httpd, Lucene, Solr for example which have *tons* more activity than > Flex currently has, and they're doing just fine with svn. > > -Bertrand
Jut because those projects are running SVN does not equate to their projects running _as efficiently as they possibly could be_. Also, you keep posting links to SVN stats. This project was in a prolonged wait period because we were/are waiting for code donations (Mustella, can't make big changed without tests) and JIRA. It's hardly fair to compare our activity to projects that have been running forever. Did they wait 8 months for vital pieces of the project to make it thru legal review? I'm betting thy didn't. -omar
