On 14 August 2012 20:37, Om <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > Alex but couldn't we simply make "[VOTE]/[DISCUSS] - [MERGE]" mandatory
> > > once we want to merge something to Develop branch?
> > >
> > > João Fernandes
> > Yes, but in order to vote, I have to get your branch and build it and
> test
> > it in order to vote.  40 committers, 40 branches at minimum.  I'd be
> > interested in hearing from the mentors how they "promote" stuff from
> branch
> > to trunk.   I was hoping it would be easier:  Instead of a vote, you just
> > check it into "develop" and we veto if we don't like it.  Then fewer
> folks
> > have to go look at it.  But that means it might not be quite ready to go
> to
> > production and need to be filtered out before release if we can't get it
> to
> > production quality in time.
> >
> >
> It should be up to a committer to decide when a feature should go from a
> feature branch to develop.  We should be able to trust a committer's
> judgement for such things.  It will be up to the release manager +
> discussion on the mailing list to accept what is in develop to cut into a
> release branch.
>
> Om
>

ok thanks

-- 

João Fernandes

Reply via email to