> > Alex but couldn't we simply make "[VOTE]/[DISCUSS] - [MERGE]" mandatory > > once we want to merge something to Develop branch? > > > > João Fernandes > Yes, but in order to vote, I have to get your branch and build it and test > it in order to vote. 40 committers, 40 branches at minimum. I'd be > interested in hearing from the mentors how they "promote" stuff from branch > to trunk. I was hoping it would be easier: Instead of a vote, you just > check it into "develop" and we veto if we don't like it. Then fewer folks > have to go look at it. But that means it might not be quite ready to go to > production and need to be filtered out before release if we can't get it to > production quality in time. > > It should be up to a committer to decide when a feature should go from a feature branch to develop. We should be able to trust a committer's judgement for such things. It will be up to the release manager + discussion on the mailing list to accept what is in develop to cut into a release branch.
Om
