If you have time to scratch this itch, start scratching!
On 8/3/12 1:03 AM, "Alain Ekambi" <jazzmatad...@gmail.com> wrote: > Indeed my Email was before the survey. I though that Fabridge was not in > the release( looks like i was wrong). > > @ Scott Guthmann > Looking at my Support for the Flex Framework and the Flash platform in > general. For more then 4 years i ve been trying to bring Flex/Flash/AIR > to Java developers. Been in tons of conference to talk about how great the > Flash platform is when it comes to RIA. > > I even went the insane road to export the entire Flash Platform to > Java(using GWT) so transition for Java Devs will be even smoother(No > excuses that you dont like ActionScript, do it in Java now loool) and also > the integration of some HTML5 capabilities like LocalStorage, Geolocation > will be a bit simpler. > > I did not only exported Flex, but also AIR and a lot of other AS3 > libraries like AlivePDF, PurePDF, Aswing, AS3Xls, Starling, etc... > Concerning FABridge i reported bugs to Adobe( They were so nice to never > fix them). > > When Adobe screw things up with they announcement to donate Flex to Apache > (Note i think the donation s great just the way they went about it was > terrible) i was in every forum possible trying to reassure people and > customers that Flash/Flex is still a great platform to build on. > > Even at my day to day work i had to fight hard to not make our customers > move the ExtJS or something like that > > Aint that enough support ? > > My work never really got any attention in the Flash/Flex community. > Probably because i m leveraging Java and not AS3. Personally i think at > the end of the day the Flash platform wins. But i could not really convince > any AS3 developer. The evangelist at Adobe politely ignored my emails. Not > even a "No Thanks" (never mind). > > So yeah maybe i should maintain FABridge myself to get some more credit > loooool > > Our tools rely heavely on FABridge. If there s nobody to maintain it. We > are willing to do it. > > > Cheers, > > Alain > > 2012/8/2 Keith Sutton <ke...@spoon.as> > >> If you search the email list for 'FABridge', 'Automation',... as I have, >> you will find that it is not clear as to what is where in the email trail. >> >> The best way to resolve all this is for Alex/Carol to identify what on the >> list is at which point we can update the survey: >> 1) included in 4.8 >> 2) donated but not included in 4.8 >> 3) yet to be donated >> >> 1) 2) 3) 4.6 ViewStack >> 1) 2) 3) 4.6 Accordion >> 1) 2) 3) 4.6 DateField >> 1) 2) 3) 4.6 DataChooser >> 1) 2) 3) 4.6 Enhanced DataGrid >> 1) 2) 3) 4.6 missing automation libraries >> 1) 2) 3) 4.6 missing fabridge >> 1) 2) 3) 4.6 missing flash-integration >> 1) 2) 3) 4.6 missing samples >> 1) 2) 3) 4.6 missing embedded font support >> 1) 2) 3) 3.x Flex SDK >> 1) 2) 3) Flex compiler source code >> 1) 2) 3) BlazeDS/BlazeDS.NET >> 1) 2) 3) TLF >> 1) 2) 3) Gravity >> 1) 2) 3) FXG >> 1) 2) 3) Squiggly >> 1) 2) 3) OSMF >> >> >> >> >> On 8/2/2012 9:39 AM, Alex Harui wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 8/2/12 9:06 AM, "David Francis Buhler" <davidbuh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> @Alex. I think Alain is referrring to the Flex Roadmap Survey which asks >>>> how important FABridge support is in the future of Flex development. >>>> >>>> If FABridge has been donated, and is stable, perhaps the survey should >>>> exclude related FABridge questions? >>>> >>> Alain's email was sent before the survey. Unforunately, the information >>> in >>> the survey and some emails from Keith and Scott is out-of-date and >>> incorrect. The survey will have little impact on what Adobe does because >>> most of the items have been donated or are already in the process of being >>> donated. >>> >>> >> -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
