On Jul 13, 2012, at 2:07 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > > On 7/13/12 1:34 PM, "Dave Fisher" <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: > >> >> On Jul 12, 2012, at 1:44 PM, Alex Harui wrote: >> >>> Hi Mentors, >>> >>> This is not as high priority as Carol’s release-related questions, but I >>> want >>> to ask it now before I forget. >>> >>> The Falcon compiler currently has a dependency on a library that is licensed >>> under OSI CPL [1]. It does not appear to be listed as compatible here [2], >>> but I see several Apache projects using Junit for testing which is also >>> under >>> CPL. However, a key difference would be that Falcon’s CPL dependency is for >>> a required component, not for optional tests. >> >> How is this one different from the two MPL 1.1 parts? Those seem to be >> "required". > MPL is Category B so it is my understanding we can have a required > dependency on an MPL binary.
> > The library in question is Jburg [1]. OSI CPL is not listed in any category > (A, B or X) so I don't know what the rules are for it. When I click on CPL 1.0 on legal/resolved in the catagory B list, I am linked to http://opensource.org/licenses/cpl1.0.php > > However I have since learned that Falcon is using it as a build tool, so it > may not matter. > > [1] http://jburg.sourceforge.net/ A key piece I see. Regards, Dave > > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >
