> If you want to discuss certain compiler hooks that take "non-standard" > ActionScript and turn it into standard ActionScript; that is probably > on-topic.
Which is how you could have chosen to look at it, because that's what I did, seeing as how a little innovation couldn't hurt, eh? On May 22, 2012, at 10:27 AM, Jeffry Houser <jef...@dot-com-it.com> wrote: > On 5/22/2012 1:15 PM, Ariel Jakobovits wrote: >> Why can't a new compiler for apache flex support a new version of as4 even >> if it is not official with adobe?? We have already talked about moving to >> haxe. > [Sorry Jonathon; but I Thought this was a relevant Apache Flex question] > > How do you get a new version of ActionScript without it being official from > Adobe? > > If you want to discuss certain compiler hooks that take "non-standard" > ActionScript and turn it into standard ActionScript; that is probably > on-topic. > > If you want to talk about ActionScript 4 move to the Adobe forums or some > other forum. > > > -- > Jeffry Houser > Technical Entrepreneur > 203-379-0773 > -- > http://www.flextras.com?c=104 > UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready! > -- > http://www.theflexshow.com > http://www.jeffryhouser.com > http://www.asktheflexpert.com > -- > Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust >