> If you want to discuss certain compiler hooks that take "non-standard" 
> ActionScript and turn it into standard ActionScript; that is probably 
> on-topic.

Which is how you could have chosen to look at it, because that's what I did, 
seeing as how a little innovation couldn't hurt, eh?



On May 22, 2012, at 10:27 AM, Jeffry Houser <jef...@dot-com-it.com> wrote:

> On 5/22/2012 1:15 PM, Ariel Jakobovits wrote:
>> Why can't a new compiler for apache flex support a new version of as4 even 
>> if it is not official with adobe?? We have already talked about moving to 
>> haxe.
> [Sorry Jonathon; but I Thought this was a relevant Apache Flex question]
> 
> How do you get a new version of ActionScript without it being official from 
> Adobe?
> 
> If you want to discuss certain compiler hooks that take "non-standard" 
> ActionScript and turn it into standard ActionScript; that is probably 
> on-topic.
> 
> If you want to talk about ActionScript 4 move to the Adobe forums or some 
> other forum.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jeffry Houser
> Technical Entrepreneur
> 203-379-0773
> --
> http://www.flextras.com?c=104
> UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready!
> --
> http://www.theflexshow.com
> http://www.jeffryhouser.com
> http://www.asktheflexpert.com
> --
> Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust
> 

Reply via email to