Hi everybody!
Thanks for your replies!
When i wrote this change, i was worried about backward compatibility,
so i did everything to make it work properly without conflicts with
bindings and other things, also, implementation is similar to bindings
and it's parsed well, i suggest
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Roland Zwaga <rol...@stackandheap.com> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I welcome this addition as well! I've had plenty of times when I just
> wanted to assign a value once, without binding, when I still needed the
> curly braces because otherwise the compiler would just see the value as a
> literal.
> From what I can gather, this wouldn't have any bad effects on anything else.
>
> cheerios,
>
> Roland
>
> On 24 April 2012 15:50, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think this is a nice idea. As this involves an addition to MXML syntax
>> (ie attr="${value}" rather than attr="{value}" to bind to value once) does
>> anyone have any suggestions on how we can take this forward?
>>
>> Are there any disadvantages/issues that if this was applied that I'm not
>> seeing?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Justin
>
>
>
>
> --
> regards,
> Roland
>
> --
> Roland Zwaga
> Senior Consultant | Stack & Heap BVBA
>
> +32 (0)486 16 12 62 | rol...@stackandheap.com | http://www.stackandheap.com
--
С уважением, Сергей Егоров
