Hi there,
I welcome this addition as well! I've had plenty of times when I just
wanted to assign a value once, without binding, when I still needed the
curly braces because otherwise the compiler would just see the value as a
literal.
>From what I can gather, this wouldn't have any bad effects on anything else.
cheerios,
Roland
On 24 April 2012 15:50, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think this is a nice idea. As this involves an addition to MXML syntax
> (ie attr="${value}" rather than attr="{value}" to bind to value once) does
> anyone have any suggestions on how we can take this forward?
>
> Are there any disadvantages/issues that if this was applied that I'm not
> seeing?
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
--
regards,
Roland
--
Roland Zwaga
Senior Consultant | Stack & Heap BVBA
+32 (0)486 16 12 62 | rol...@stackandheap.com | http://www.stackandheap.com
