> > > > Suddenly you have a huge mess of callbacks you have to reorganize. > > No, I don't have a mess, I keep my code well organized. On the contrary, > Spicefactory code is always a mess, from the very start and it's not > possible to fix. > > What you call "very easily" is your perception of reality, because > operating plain event handlers is, in fact, much easier then what Parsley > offers.The very simple proof to it is the reduced code surface (when not > using Parsley), improved intellisense (when not using Parsley), conscious > and well accepted techniques employed for writing the code (bizarre / not > idiomatic techniques are used in Parsley, they borrow heavily from other > languages and environments, but are foreign to AS3 / Flash), improved > debugging abilities (when not using Parsley). > > People often times want to believe every single thing written on the > internet - Parsley advertising Parsley is just another random writing on > the internet, as baseless and pointless as your next Myspace profile. This > doesn't apply to Parsley exclusively. At the same measure it applies to > every "microacitecture framework", because architecture cannot be canned in > the form of a library that you plug to your project. You will get spaghetti > code with or without using any "microacitecture framework" with exactly the > same probability.
I thought this thread was about async programming and not about trashing Parsley? Seriously, the whole pro- or con- micro-architecture framework discussion is rather pointless, at the end of the day its a matter of preference. Just my two cents... Roland
