> Parsley also supports this stuff. Parsley 3.0 is especially nice as > instead of being dependent on tasks (which the previous version relied on), > you can re-use you standard Parsley commands. >
Sorry, this may be more typical of C/C++ people, but it's almost a subject worth an xkcd comic... Every time I hear the word "standard" I expect it to be followed by ISO / ASCII / ISBN or similar set of capital roman letters and a number. :) Parsley is not a standard and it's commands are no more standards then my five spoons of sugar I put into my espresso cup. In order to continue in the spirit of xkcd and standards compliance, there's this RFC-1925 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1925 paragraph 6a that states that: It is always possible to add another level of indirection. This is the only RFC or standard that Parsley follows most fully and unconditionally. Sorry, unforgettable personal experience with this particular piece of software made me post this comment. I apologize beforehand for any such or similar experiences caused by the comment! :) Best. Oleg
