On Saturday, March 17, 2012, Left Right <olegsivo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> For generic MXML that is correct but for the Flex SDK there is ie > flex-config.xml. > Justin, you are confusing Flex SDK and Flex framework. If you use SDK, you > may not use the framework. MXML doesn't require that you use UIComponent or > download any RSLs. I'm not "assuming" it, I know it for a fact because that > is how I use it. There are others, who do it the way I do. I have even > posted once to Adobe community documentation system an article about it, > because it's a common confusion. Here's the article itself: > http://kb2.adobe.com/community/publishing/526/cpsid_52670.html . > Lastly, why Flex should make things worse? If it was good (correct) before, > while being generic, why Flex have to come and spoil it? :S > > Best. > > Oleg >
How is Flex spoiling anything? You can still do that and no one is talking about removing that. I think all we are talking about is what to use for components that are not yet " officially" in Spark or MX package. Flex needs the xmlns because the community did not want FxList and wanted s:List. This thread feels like its gone way off the tracks. -omar
