I really do not see any problem here. Its flexible and that's the point. a On 17 Mar 2012 01:55, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > If we make no changes it probably means that down the track we're likely > to end up with this: > > <s:Application width="100%" > xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"; > xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark" > xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx" > xmlns:a="http://flex.apache.org/ns"; > xmlns:as="http://flex.apache.org/sparkns"; > xmlns:amx="http://flex.apache.org/mxns"; > xmlns:nc="http://flex.apache.org/ncns";> > > Which I'd like to avoid somehow. > > Thanks, > Justin > > PS "nc" is new component model that someone's come up.
