BTW, I don't think the TLF code in SDK 4.6 repo compiles cleanly for player 
11.1 I've seen deprecation warnings about TLF using player APIs that have been 
deprecated.

- Gordon Smith, Adobe


-----Original Message-----
From: omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Om
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 4:44 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: TLF and Flex (was Re: [jira] [Updated] (FLEX-23) Add support for 
newer versions of the Text Layout Framework to build scripts)

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> On 2/28/12 4:25 PM, "Om" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Can Folks from Adobe shed some light on how TLF is integrated with 
> > the
> Flex
> > SDK currently?  I saw a note from an Adobe employee(?) on this blog post:
> >
> http://blogs.adobe.com/tlf/2011/08/tlf-branch-3-0-is-available-on-sour
> ceforge-
> > net.html
> > *
> > *
> > * "By jinhuang - 6:33 AM on November 4, 2011
> > *
> >
> > *TLF 3.0 final version is now released on 
> > http://sourceforge.net/projects/tlf.adobe/files/3.0/current/
> > It has passed the tests of Flex SDK team, and Flex SDK will pick up 
> > TLF
> 3.0
> > in their release next year."*
> >
> > Questions:
> >
> > 1.  What kind of tests does this include?
> > 2.  Is that separate from Mustella?
> > 3.  If yes, will that suite be donated to Apache Flex as well?
> >
> TLF is verified by Flex via Mustella.
> TLF may get donated to Apache.  The current plan is to find the time 
> and verify there aren't any blocking legal or business issues.
> TLF often changes in ways that you can't swap in versions of TLF 
> without changing SDK code.
>

Thanks for the clarification.  This is good news and bad news.  Good that we 
have some sort of test coverage for TLF.  Bad because a simple fix to the build 
script is not going to be sufficient to move to TLF 3.0.

We wont know until we get a hold of Mustella, test the SDK with TLF3.0 before 
we can approve the change.


>
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>
>

Reply via email to