On 2/28/2012 5:07 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
On 2/28/12 1:53 PM, "Ryan Frishberg"<fri...@gmail.com> wrote:
I find that approach a little bit too gun-slinger in the wild-west. If
this was just an application, I wouldn't see as much of a point for
component specification. However, this is an SDK. More developers are
interested in our component specifications than just those who want to
check out the apache code.
Yes, but I call those kinds of specs "documentation". It describes what the
code actually does. And we will hopefully have good documentation.
I agree with Alex on this one. Now we may want to vet APIs before
they get into the main SDK / release and that is what the voting process
is for. But, I wouldn't force anyone into a pre-discussion before they
start building anything. I want them to build it for what they need,
donate it, and then we can figure out if it needs to be tweaked or
whatever.
--
Jeffry Houser
Technical Entrepreneur
203-379-0773
--
http://www.flextras.com?c=104
UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready!
--
http://www.theflexshow.com
http://www.jeffryhouser.com
http://www.asktheflexpert.com
--
Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust
