On 2/28/12 1:53 PM, "Ryan Frishberg" <fri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I find that approach a little bit too gun-slinger in the wild-west. If
> this was just an application, I wouldn't see as much of a point for
> component specification. However, this is an SDK. More developers are
> interested in our component specifications than just those who want to
> check out the apache code.
Yes, but I call those kinds of specs "documentation". It describes what the
code actually does. And we will hopefully have good documentation.
> We have strong backwards-compatibility
> requirements, and having a wiki where the API proposal is clearly laid out
> with possible issues makes sense to me.
Hopefully we will catch backward-compatibility issues via automated tests.
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
