I think this is an excellent idea.

The ANT Task could replace user-defined tokens inside both the HTML pages
and .AS/MXML files for copy.

BTW:The older Flash Ford Sync website (2009?) had an alternative HTML
version that displayed the same content as the Flash Version (complete with
images and menu options). The Flash version ranked very well on Google as a
result.

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:06 PM, jude <flexcapaci...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> With both of the above solutions we could create or have a gui to create a
> sitemap.xml file that defines the fragments our apps listen for and the
> redirect links to get the raw content. We could also have the compiler or
> ant task support the creation of multiple HTML wrapper pages that are
> identical to the main wrapper page except in their name and / or the option
> of embedding the content into the page (if html) or if dynamic content it
> would point to a dynamic page.
>
>
>
> Example sitemap.xml
> <site>
>  <page name="home" url="http://example.com/main/#home"; rawcontent="
> http://example.com/main.php?page=home"; html="http://example.com/home.html";
> />
>  <page name="products" url="http://example.com/main/#products";
> rawcontent="
> http://example.com/main.php?page=products";
> html="http://example.com/products.html"/>
> </site>
>
> Site.xml ex 2
> <site>
>  <page name="home" url="http://example.com/main/#home"; ajax="
> http://example.com/main.php?p=10"; />
>  <page name="products" url="http://example.com/main/#p=10"; ajax="
> http://example.com/main/main.php?p=10"; />
> </site>
>
>
> If we supported something like this and just started using and uploading it
> in our projects it might remove the complexities for the search engines.
>
>
> [1]
>
> http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/10/proposal-for-making-ajax-crawlable.html
> [2]
>
> http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/10/proposal-for-making-ajax-crawlable.html?showComment=1256080765377#c3966241161139678970
> [3] http://www.assembla.com/wiki/show/flexcapacitor
> [4] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnrx30KahIc
> [5] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmIz6Upc6dY
>

Reply via email to