On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > > > On 2/23/12 11:55 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > >> I think using the localechanges branch should be fine, no? We could use > it > >> to stage all the things we'd like to bring in as soon as Mustella makes > its > >> way in and we can test the framework. > > > > Might be better it it had a different name if it contains more than the > locale > > changes. > True, but I don't care what you call it. It will hopefully be temporary. > I > don't see the need for multiple temporary branches. > > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > I agree here, I didn't think the branch now named localchanges was really meant to segregate just those changes but simply to minimize the possibility of conflicts and problems in the trunk as we get Apache Infra to import more SVN dumps. i dont see the real need for having a bunch of branches to stage those patches either. -- Omar Gonzalez s9tpep...@apache.org Apache Flex PPMC Member
