On 2/22/12 7:58 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Well, My assumption is because the size of the SVN dumps
> I wouldn't expect the framework code that's already in SVN to be reimported in
> the same way again. Other Adobe donations would be a large import but there no
> issues there.
>
> Hopefully Carol (or someone else) can confirm that changes to
> build_framework.xml are OK or that a SVN revert of any changes to
> build_framework.xml (if it was required) would not be an issue.
>
> Justin
I'm not an SVN expert, but the plan is for Adobe to load at least one more
huge dump (compiler) and maybe a huge mustella check=in, and hopefully a
smaller automation check-in before cutting a "parity" release.
However, I think you can branch what's there, make your changes in trunk and
we can cut the parity release from the branch. I'm not an SVN expert, but I
think we can control what revisions get integrated into the parity branch.
If someone else familiar with SVN can confirm, then that would be my
recommendation.
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
