>From the video, this is what I got: 1. Flash Builder 4.x will continue supporting Flex 4.6 for next five years 2. New compiler(Falcon) will support ActionScript 3. Community wants Falcon to be open sourced ASAP and not wait till MXML support is built. Community wants to build MXML support. 4. Once MXML support is built into Falcon, Adobe will investigate how they can investigate back into Flash Builder. 5. Apache Flex will most likely work with future versions of Adobe Flash Builder, but Adobe will not officially support it. 6. Apache Flex will be supported by Apache.
All this sounds very reasonable to me. What is the problem here? Om On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Keith Sutton <ke...@spoon.as> wrote: > IntelliJ, PowerFlasher and Ensemble (Tofino) have all signed up to support > Spoon and Apache Flex. Should Flex support in FB become less that optimal > there are other options that fully support it. > > > On 2/15/2012 8:49 AM, Jeff Tapper wrote: > >> Don’t forget that Flashbuilder isn’t the only commercially available IDE >> for >> flex. Lots of other good products out there. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Fréderic Cox [mailto:frede...@exuvis.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 11:46 AM >> To: Apache Flex Mailing List >> Subject: Re: Adobe / Apache / Spoon Flex Tour >> >> Sure looks like it. I'm holding off a big project I was going to start >> this >> week until this is cleared out .. Why code all from scratch in AS if you >> have a framework based on AS? >> >> >> They still are messing up the PR. Even after they know they communicate >> badly they realize it and then ... Communicate badly again >> >> On 15/02/12 17:42, "Pierangelo >> Mancusi"<pierangelo.mancusi@**gmail.com<pierangelo.manc...@gmail.com> >> > >> wrote: >> >> everybody crazy at Adobe?... >>> >> >> >
