Hi Omar, yes it technically is like a README
The difference would be that you don't have to check out files from svn to check what is going on in the different whiteboards. it's just a way to lower the barrier on getting info on the project. Many people are watching the project. But those that are interested my not do a svn checkout just to see what is happening. Also might trigger people to join in faster as they might discover something via the wiki of their interest. As the number of whiteboards will probably grow there will not be an easy way to see what is happening on each one. I would love to see such low barrier transparency. But it's not a must i agree. Arnoud On Feb 6, 2012, at 5:51 PM, Omar Gonzalez wrote: > On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Arnoud Bos <arn...@artim-interactive.nl>wrote: > >> >> On Feb 6, 2012, at 5:03 PM, João Saleiro wrote: >> >>> >>> On 06-02-2012 15:44, Jonathan Campos wrote: >>>> Wouldn't that fit better in the whiteboard folder? Or maybe if we set >> up a >>>> wiki by whiteboard folder I would be okay with that. >> >> I like this idea a lot >> >> It would be great if people could have a standard public wiki page >> connected to their whiteboard where they can write: >> - what they are doing, >> - who is doing it, >> - why they are doing it, >> - and their short term / long term plans, >> - tell about the state of their code (usable, pre-alpha), >> - basically anything they want to share. >> > > Isn't what you're describing here the contents typically in a README file? > > -omar
