On Monday, February 6, 2012, Martin Heidegger <m...@leichtgewicht.at> wrote: > On 06/02/2012 23:28, Jonathan Campos wrote: >> >> Why do you need consensus just to get started? > > Just to clearify: I meant "getting the consensus" as in "understanding what the current consensus on the mailinglist is". > In other words: Its easy to discuss something on the ml but difficult to find out what has been discussed about and what the outcome is. > That is unfortunate for a third party as they will have no idea what is really talked about. > > cheers! > Martin. >
I don't see any sensible way to keep a log of everything we've talked about. Talk is cheap and Apache is a JFDI type of mentality, if you really want to start on something just fucking do it and when you have code to talk about, even the smallest bit, then we actually have something to talk about. If I wasn't a committer I'd throw my code up on GitHub and start collaborating with devs there until you have something you want to donate or discuss. But if we try to discuss every idea, log it to a wiki, recruit devs, and then start something then we would never get shit done. -omar
