I want join development team, please guide me On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 10:29 PM, FRANKLIN GARZON <fgarzo...@hotmail.com>wrote:
> > I Suggest put in 2 ways the versions, like some very big companies, a > version system like: > For developers and major control: > Use the Omer proposal, it's basic and necesary absolutly. > For commercial and more friendly understand: > Use the year. For example: > Apache Flex 2012 (v4.6.x) > Apache Flex 2012 (v 4.7.x) > Apache Flex 2013 (v5.0.x) > Of course this is the community, but we need to think also in the > commercial way appart to not get any special payment. But is a community > marketing, also think in the future events you can say: The event of Flex > 2012, more marketing no? > > > Franklin Garzón > > Regional Team Leader > > MCTS - MCITP Microsoft SQLServer 2005 > > > *Si el hombre dejara de aprender entonces dejaría de existir* > > 094496862 / 593-022234585 > > > > From: joan.llenas.m...@gmail.com > > Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 16:17:23 +0100 > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] ApacheFlex Versioning (was Re: A newbie's guide > to building the SDK (and a question)) > > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org > > > > From a developer standpoint is less problematic to use years. > > From a product standpoint has less impact because users always know what > to > > expect. > > > > > > -- > > Joan Llenas Masó > > http://joan.garnet.io > > @joangarnet (es) > > @joanllenas (en) > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 16:11, Michael Schmalle <m...@teotigraphix.com > >wrote: > > > > > Does anyone have any idea why Alex suggested years? Was there a reason? > > > > > > I am in agreement as well with what Omar stated, just curious why Alex > > > would deviate from what most developers were expecting. > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > Quoting Yennick Trevels <yennick.trev...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > Simple, logical and easy to understand for "the outside world". > Perfect > > >> imo. > > >> > > >> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Jonathan Campos < > jonbcam...@gmail.com > > >> >wrote: > > >> > > >> It is also what I thought from the beginning. > > >>> > > >>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski < > nicho...@spoon.as > > >>> >wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > This version number scheme has been in my mind the entire time. It > > >>> makes > > >>> > complete sense. > > >>> > > > >>> > -Nick > > >>> > > > >>> > On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Jeffry Houser < > jef...@dot-com-it.com > > >>> > >wrote: > > >>> > > > >>> > > On 1/22/2012 9:44 AM, Omar Gonzalez wrote: > > >>> > > > > >>> > >> Thoughts? Do we need a vote for versioning scheme? > > >>> > >> > > >>> > > > > >>> > > This approach seems logical enough to me and I have nothing > else to > > >>> add. > > >>> > > > > >>> > > -- > > >>> > > Jeffry Houser > > >>> > > Technical Entrepreneur > > >>> > > 203-379-0773 > > >>> > > -- > > >>> > > http://www.flextras.com?c=104 > > >>> > > UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready! > > >>> > > -- > > >>> > > http://www.theflexshow.com > > >>> > > http://www.jeffryhouser.com > > >>> > > http://www.asktheflexpert.com > > >>> > > -- > > >>> > > Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Jonathan Campos > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
