Does anyone have any idea why Alex suggested years? Was there a reason?
I am in agreement as well with what Omar stated, just curious why Alex
would deviate from what most developers were expecting.
Mike
Quoting Yennick Trevels <yennick.trev...@gmail.com>:
Simple, logical and easy to understand for "the outside world". Perfect imo.
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Jonathan Campos <jonbcam...@gmail.com>wrote:
It is also what I thought from the beginning.
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski <nicho...@spoon.as
>wrote:
> This version number scheme has been in my mind the entire time. It makes
> complete sense.
>
> -Nick
>
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Jeffry Houser <jef...@dot-com-it.com
> >wrote:
>
> > On 1/22/2012 9:44 AM, Omar Gonzalez wrote:
> >
> >> Thoughts? Do we need a vote for versioning scheme?
> >>
> >
> > This approach seems logical enough to me and I have nothing else to
add.
> >
> > --
> > Jeffry Houser
> > Technical Entrepreneur
> > 203-379-0773
> > --
> > http://www.flextras.com?c=104
> > UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready!
> > --
> > http://www.theflexshow.com
> > http://www.jeffryhouser.com
> > http://www.asktheflexpert.com
> > --
> > Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust
> >
> >
>
--
Jonathan Campos
