On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:59 AM, David Arno <da...@davidarno.org> wrote: > Should we just ignore Falcon and instead consider a major overhaul of mxmlc, > or even a completely new compiler?
It sounds like, at best, we might be able to follow Falcon development updates (and thanks in advance to Alex for keeping us apprised). But if it's not being done in the open, it doesn't feel like the kind of thing we should (or can?) use to steer decisions. That'd be a very tenuous coupling. An alternate compiler would be very interesting, at least.
