Cool. On 14 Jan 2012 13:08, "Michael Schmalle" <m...@teotigraphix.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > """ > Note: The design as accepted by popular vote will be treated as a proposal > that can be tweaked and cemented into it's final published form. > """ > > Note the rules say "design" not logo. What you are worried about is not an > issue. > > AIt has also been stated that the url that was submitted is the design > being voted on even if designers make newer versions, they need to update > the original submission url. > > Mike > > > Quoting Matthew Poole <mattjpo...@gmail.com>: > > Incidentally, many of the logos on the submissions page have multiple >> variations. How would the voters know the are voting for the >> same variation of a specific logo? >> >> Might not be important, but perhaps we should have stipulated that the >> entrants provide one variation only per submission, but allow multiple >> submissions per entrant? >> >> On 13 January 2012 20:26, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: >> >> >>> On Jan 13, 2012, at 12:44 AM, Rui Silva wrote: >>> >>> > Alex, >>> > >>> >> IMHO, the PPMC is that set of managers and should make the final >>> > decision. >>> >> It sounds like we have some folks who understand branding issues >>> > commenting >>> >> on the submissions. I think that's enough information for the PPMC to >>> > go >>> >> with. A popular vote in these circumstances is not controlled enough. >>> > >>> > >>> > Agree in full. Apart from the comments I have been making to some of >>> the >>> > logo submission there have been others with a good grasp of some of the >>> > issues regarding branding doing the same. On the other hand I worry a >>> lot >>> > that, on an open, uncontrolled poll, popularity issues become prevalent >>> and >>> > that's definitely not the way I'd like a logo for Flex to be chosen. >>> >>> This is why the vote needs to be on the list. All of us can see who cast >>> each vote. A lot of work for the person tallying the results, but it is >>> completely transparent. This is particularly important for PPMC votes >>> which >>> are the ones that are "binding." >>> >>> The PPMC ought to consider what the larger community thinks. Remember one >>> of the goals for graduation from the incubator is proving the capability >>> of >>> growing and adding new committers to the project based on the merits of >>> their contributions to the community. The community includes more than >>> coding. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Dave >>> >>> >>> >>> > >>> > Rui >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >> > > >
