>> but I'm still confused the intent of the rule This will be reagrding the cost of printing in any more than two colours, we'd need to establilsh that it looks good under these circumstances. fairly standard.
I really like the improvements. Tinks suggestions are good (though with the broken X you really get the feeling that the tips are the hands of the community) Can I also add that it would be nice to see what it looked like with the kerning on the Apache copy increased (i.f that was allowed by apache bransing rules) so it is the same length as the FLEX copy. failing that what does it look like with a font big enough to make the the same length? On 13 January 2012 10:53, Denis Kristianto <deniskristia...@gmail.com>wrote: > @ Tink > Thank you so much for the advice. yes, you're right, but I'm still > confused the > intent of the rule. ok, I will try to learn again and I try to make other > variations. once againthanks a lot. > > 2012/1/13 Tink <f...@tink.ws> > > > > >>> > >>> > >>> design depicting a community by combining the letter 'X' which > >>>> represents > >>>> the cross platform. > >>>> > >>>> *URL* > >>>> image: http://omdenis.com/files/**apache_flex2.png< > http://omdenis.com/files/apache_flex2.png> > >>>> zip: http://omdenis.com/files/**apache_flex.ai2.zip< > http://omdenis.com/files/apache_flex.ai2.zip> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > > > I too like this, but feel the 'x' is a little too complex. > > > > I'd like to see a version where the 'x' isn't broken (i.e. has the > > different colors, but is a solid object). > > > > Also the rules state that it must translate to a 2 color look ( > > http://incubator.apache.org/**flex/logo-contest.html< > http://incubator.apache.org/flex/logo-contest.html>), > > so always worth including how you propose your logo would look in 2 > colors. > > > > >
