:) we're just trying out the "+1" keys in the absense of anything more significant to vote on.
On 12 January 2012 14:29, Michael Schmalle <m...@teotigraphix.com> wrote: > Quoting Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org>: > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Rui Silva <f...@rduartes.net> wrote: >> >>> ...Just a question, should all blog posts be voted here before >>> submitting?.. >>> >> >> As suggested in >> http://markmail.org/message/**hw25dha7dhxp77nk<http://markmail.org/message/hw25dha7dhxp77nk>I >> think >> lazy consensus is good enough unless you expect your blog post to be >> controversial. >> >> (and a lazy consensus doesn't need a [VOTE] subject line header, see >> http://www.apache.org/**foundation/voting.html#**LazyConsensus<http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus>- >> it's not >> a real vote, your just asking if anyone's opposed and indicating how >> long you'll wait to take action). >> >> Anybody can request to turn a lazy consensus into an actual [VOTE], >> but in general it's best to avoid over-voting on everything ;-) >> >> -Bertrand >> >> > Bertrand, maybe we're voting on who is the blog PR front man. ;-) > > Mike > >
