On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:04 AM, f...@rduartes.net <f...@rduartes.net> wrote:
> I would go as far as to suggest that the first Apache Flex release should > equivalent in code to the current Adobe Flex 4.6 release. This would > guarantee that there is no gap in terms of code between the Adobe era and > the Apache era. > > Rui > -1 I think releasing an identical version with the same version number will cause confusion. Especially since the signed RSL issue has yet to be sorted out. Let version 4.6 belong to Adobe. I would go so far as to say to consider resetting the version number because it currently seems tied into Flash Builder version which will also cause confusion moving forward.
