On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Dimitri k. <k...@noos.fr> wrote: > From: "Iwo Banas" <banas....@gmail.com> > > I would go as far as to suggest that the first Apache Flex release should >>> equivalent in code to the current Adobe Flex 4.6 release. >>> >> >> We can even keep the version as Apache Flex 4.6 to avoid the impression >> that we are releasing some new features. >> > > I don't -1 it, but maybe this should require some thoughts. > If Apache would release a 4.6 SDK without any other benefit than a name > change (keep in mind that the Adobe one is already open-source), and even > with real drawbacks (no cached RSLs, maybe some tooling/IDE little issues), > who would use it over the Adobe 4.6 one? > > I understand the "spirit" behind it, but I think there is so much to do > right now, that putting some of "our" ressources in a "symbolic" release > would not be a good first step in our new era. > In Adobe's usual words, how much of your 100$ are you ready to invest in a > symbolic release ;) > > > I personally would /NOT/ like to see an overlapping version number. Even if the symbolic release is a 4.6.1 or something to that effect, it would be much easier for the community to understand. Remember people outside of this mailing list really only care about the Flex SDK, not really who creates it (although, they always should!).
-Nick
