http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/flexsdk/Coding+Conventions
This is exactly why I asked because I saw that, what 4 years ago? :)
Still committed code didn't follow it.
As committers, if we agree on a convention, to we have the right to
turn down code that does not follow it and tell the developer to
format it correctly?
Surely it's not our job to do this.
Mike
Quoting Jonathan Campos <jonbcam...@gmail.com>:
Carol, we talked about this previously. I am right there with you about
uniform code. Big deal to me.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Carol Frampton <cfram...@adobe.com> wrote:
There is a coding standard but unfortunately not everyone chose to follow
it, or only followed the parts they liked.
http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/flexsdk/Coding+Conventions
I am in favor of a coding standard. I like uniform looking code.
Carol
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Schmalle <m...@teotigraphix.com>
Reply-To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:48:25 -0800
To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Flex SDK code conventions
>I hate this topic but it needs to be asked to the community.
>
>Since I am an initial committer I will stand by whatever the consensus
>is with the code I commit.
>
>But then the question, what are we doing about this?
>
>There is already ALOT of code in the sdk that uses different
>conventions. I think this is ridiculous because it slows down
>development switching from this format to that format (reading and
>writing).
>
>I don't have an opinion on conventions, just proposing there needs to
>be protocol with committers on this sooner than later. And this
>protocol needs to be documented on a public page visible to any one
>that has this same question creating patches.
>
>Mike
>
--
Jonathan Campos
Dallas Flex User Group Manager
http://www.d-flex.org/
blog: http://www.unitedmindset.com/jonbcampos
twitter: http://www.twitter.com/jonbcampos
