Carol, we talked about this previously. I am right there with you about uniform code. Big deal to me.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Carol Frampton <cfram...@adobe.com> wrote: > There is a coding standard but unfortunately not everyone chose to follow > it, or only followed the parts they liked. > > http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/flexsdk/Coding+Conventions > > I am in favor of a coding standard. I like uniform looking code. > > Carol > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Schmalle <m...@teotigraphix.com> > Reply-To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org> > Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:48:25 -0800 > To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org> > Subject: Flex SDK code conventions > > >I hate this topic but it needs to be asked to the community. > > > >Since I am an initial committer I will stand by whatever the consensus > >is with the code I commit. > > > >But then the question, what are we doing about this? > > > >There is already ALOT of code in the sdk that uses different > >conventions. I think this is ridiculous because it slows down > >development switching from this format to that format (reading and > >writing). > > > >I don't have an opinion on conventions, just proposing there needs to > >be protocol with committers on this sooner than later. And this > >protocol needs to be documented on a public page visible to any one > >that has this same question creating patches. > > > >Mike > > > > -- Jonathan Campos Dallas Flex User Group Manager http://www.d-flex.org/ blog: http://www.unitedmindset.com/jonbcampos twitter: http://www.twitter.com/jonbcampos
