Op 03-12-14 om 16:48 schreef Olivier Tristan:
> Looks like I've missed the talk about this regression introduced in 1.3.1.

>From 
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2014-October/005146.html

> This patch changes the settings associated with compression
> levels 6, 7 and 8. With this patch, -e is no longer used, but
> instead apodization functions are added. This should improve
> compression with at least 95% of all material. Independent tests
> show that this is probably the case.

As it turns out, the material for which the compression didn't 
improve is mostly 'quiet' material.

> Just wondering, the 1.2.1 was similar to 1.3 or better/worse ?

The compression did not change at all, none of the patches 
touched that part of the encoder.
_______________________________________________
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev

Reply via email to