Le 03/12/2014 16:43, Martijn van Beurden a écrit : > Op 03-12-14 om 15:49 schreef Olivier Tristan: >> [...] >> If you want to check this on a single piano note, I would be >> happy to know if this improves the monophonic use case as well. > This sample is indeed a case where the retuning of FLAC 1.3.1 > shows a severe regression. It seems the patch does work quite > well in this case, but it does not fully fix the regression. > FLAC 1.3.0 -5: 1066kB > FLAC 1.3.0 -8: 874kB > FLAC 1.3.1 -5: 1066kB > FLAC 1.3.1 -8: 1062kB > Patch -5: 990kB > Patch -8: 986kB Looks like I've missed the talk about this regression introduced in 1.3.1.
Just wondering, the 1.2.1 was similar to 1.3 or better/worse ? Thanks, -- Olivier Tristan Research & Development www.uvi.net _______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
