I know Erik is busy with maintenance and wants to get a release out soon. In the meantime, is it appropriate to tag HEAD as 1.2.1_git and include this in the CLI tools (flac, metaflac, etc)?
This would make it easier to allow programs in development to test against git flac and older flac versions. For example, sample rates above 48kHz (for ReplayGain) is available in git flac but not 1.2.1. What do you think? -- Jaren Stangret Computer Science Engineering/Mathematics University Of Minnesota
_______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
