>Dieder-- >Have you tried the same experiment with Digital ICE set in the "Normal" >setting rather than "Fine"? I find virtually no image information when I >do a difference between a "No Digital ICE" scan and a "Normal Digital ICE" >scan.
Normal or Fine can be used and again using the photoshop layers method (exclusion/difference) you can see the differences between the ICE'd version and the 'raw' version. From my experience, ICE softens details. Not enough to make me stop using it on a daily basis, but enough that if I have a neg/tranny that I want to enlarge, I will do a raw scan and do the rest myself. Dieder ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
