On 9/8/04 10:30 PM, "Brad Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, that makes sense to me too - would you suggest what we might > address best here? Scanners seem about done as a topic - they'll be around > for a while, but they are more like appliances than specialized equipment > and a lot of the issues have been addressed. I would like to keep this > group going as the expertise here seems to be better than most lists I am > aware of. I am not sure that I would feel comfortable suggesting a new focus for this list. It's Tony's baby, after all, so perhaps he should take the lead in deciding if a change is needed, or if the list is worth maintaining at all. As for me, scanners have not quite reached the "appliance" level of comfort. I have a day job (which is not photography), so I only get to do scanning when I have spare time. There is still a lot that I don't understand about this stuff, and that's why I peek over the shoulders of the experts here. I'm still trying to understand the consequences of all the 3.82e76 permutations of options in VueScan... Sometime in the next year, I hope to acquire a decent DSLR. Perhaps the ideal list focus for me would be "crusty old film photographers who want to learn how to shoot digital, but still have a big backlog of slides to scan." -- Julian Vrieslander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
