> From: arm > > The Minolta works great, have had no problems. Also have > an L-8000 > which can do 35mm but the Minolta is much easier to use. I use the > LS-8000 for MF and also have edge blur. I guess to compare apples with > apples I should compare with an LS-4000 which I think is very similar to > the Minolta as far as ease of use. I scan at 5400dpi and have no > problems. I truth I have had them both for a short time (less than a > month) so have not really run a comparison by doing several negatives and > slides in both machines to see how much of a difference the > 5400dpi is with the 4000dpi of the LS-8000.
Is it likely that a medium format scanner will have greater DOF than a 35mm scanner, just because it needs it for larger pieces of film? -- Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco Paul mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
