On 1/15/02 7:46 PM, Steve Greenbank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote: >I have yet to be convinced that a LCD can match a decent CRT for image >processing work (or fast moving games). > >The imaging expert at Tom's Hardware agrees: > "Graphic artists shouldn't even consider picking up one >of these gadgets" > >Full review: > http://www4.tomshardware.com/display/02q1/020114/index.html > >Conclusion CRT v LCD here for those who can't be bothered to read the rest: > http://www4.tomshardware.com/display/02q1/020114/lcd-26.html >
I did not read the entire article, but my skimming did not catch any mention of the Apple LCD monitors. Their current models (22" Cinema Display and 17" Studio Display) are being used by quite a few graphics pros. We have the Studio Display in our office, and on the desk next to it is a highend Sony 21" CRT (GDM-F520). Both have been calibrated and profiled with the new LCD/CRT version of ColorVision's Monitor Spyder. The Apple display is brighter and has a greater dynamic range than the Sony. Color balance varies slightly with viewing angle, but not nearly as much as earlier generation LCDs. Both are excellent displays. -- Julian Vrieslander <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
