Until I can use the full frame of 35mm lenses I won't be interested. You
can't control the depth of field in the current digital point and shoots.
Everything is in focus, due to the very short focal lengths and slow speed
of these lenses.
Frank Paris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alan Tyson
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 7:26 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon scanner selection
>
>
> > But do some of you have the idea to switch to digital for
> everyday
> > photography? That would seem strange to me.
>
> Yes, I do, as and when I can afford digital 3600x2400 pixel
> frames, as I get from my scanner (probably in a decade or
> so), because of..
>
> 1. immediacy of seeing a preview, so I can take it again if
> I shook, someone moved, or I composed the shot wrongly;
>
> 2. the remarkable exposure latitude and low-light
> sensitivity of the approx. 500 ukpound digital cameras I've
> seen and borrowed;
>
> 3. time saving and improved quality control, cutting out the
> processing & neg handling;
>
> 4. elimination of dust trouble;
>
> 5. cost (neglecting the initial capital outlay, which is too
> much for me at the moment).
>
> Alan T
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: fotografia - tomasz zakrzewski
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 1:56 PM
> Subject: Odp: filmscanners: Nikon scanner selection
>
