On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 at 18:33, Mark Filipak <markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail....@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > On 11/06/2025 11.48, Rob Hallam wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 at 02:45, Mark Filipak wrote: > > > >> Apparently, the people that I meant to reach have not been reached. So, in > >> order to gain > >> credibility, I'm going to show you what I did for 25 years. > > > > This is the user list. Did/do you intend to reach the ffmpeg developers? > > Yes, I did, Rob. I've applied to ffmpeg-devel three times in the last week > and got no response.
It is unfortunate you were discounted, but given the venue I am not sure what we can achieve. I say this not to discourage you but with an eye on where the discussion is likely to go, - debates over what 'trial-and-error coding' is/means/how it works (has already happened) - pros and cons of FSM ( / FSA / DFA) - bugs in ffmpeg and how critical those are - debates about how well fieldmatch works (and its friend ↓) - debates about how well documented fieldmatch is - debates about other filters - ... etc ... None of these bring you closer to what I presume -- please correct me if I'm wrong -- is your goal: a rewrite of some part of ffmpeg implemented in an FSM. Bearing in mind the audience: what can we concretely do, in your view? Cheers, Rob _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
