On Monday 3 Apr 2017 15:32 CEST, Nicolas George wrote: > Le quartidi 14 germinal, an CCXXV, Cecil Westerhof a écrit : >> By the way: when I am going to use an other preset like slow, the >> file will be smaller, but can I count on it that the quality is at >> least as good as with ultrafast? > > The quality is set by crf; the preset changes the efforts to achieve > it, and thus the file size.
Maybe I could set crf back to 24 or 23 and use slow or slower. It will still be small (I think) and the quality would be better. I could do the conversion in a batch. >> Well, ffmpeg already took all my cores. That is part of the problem >> of long runs: when the conversion runs, I can almost do nothing >> else on my computer. > > This is completely abnormal. But probably not related to FFmpeg. With top I see that ffmpeg takes more as 500% CPU. -- Cecil Westerhof Senior Software Engineer LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
