On Monday 3 Apr 2017 12:42 CEST, Nicolas George wrote: > Le quartidi 14 germinal, an CCXXV, Cecil Westerhof a écrit : >> Is there a way to decrease the size significantly, that does not >> take to much time and still keeps a good quality? > > If there was, we would all be using it. > > Video encoding is always a compromise between output size, output > quality and encoding time, with a few other considerations like > compatibility on top of that to make things harder. > > You cannot hope to increase one of the threes without sacrificing > one of the others or both. > > Sometimes, it can be done just by using a better encoder, but x264 > is pretty much top of the line.
Well, there are always optimums. As in my other reply: with the advice from Chronek I got a smaller file, that was generated a lot faster, without a quality loss that I was aware of. I was hoping to get a few good rule of thumbs from the people that are experienced with doing this stuff. ;-) -- Cecil Westerhof Senior Software Engineer LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
