On 01/02/2020 20:37, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> I was not vague, your reasoning that because of dolby we need to comply to 
> some
> standards is not good.
> Even dolby does not follow this as already mentioned on this same thread.

So write this in the email instead of one completely devoid of any reasoning.
Replies that say something is wrong or that you disagree, and not /why/ are not
useful to the author, nor are they effective at persuading others. I'm certainly
reminded of why I stopped frequenting this list.

Anyway, your argument is basically that we shouln't conform to specs depending
on who wrote them? That's arbitrary, and a poor precedent to set, in my opinion.
Further, AudioToolBox, while it may use an official decoder, is not distributed 
by
Dolby, nor, as far as I know, endorsed by them (they won't even tell you if it's
theirs inside, I believe). I suspect Apple set it up to not apply DRC, not 
Dolby.

The rest of your mail is more trolling, which I will not reply to.

So, that's my two cents on the subject - the rest of the list can decide if they
have merit or not - I am done replying to you, since you cannot act like an 
adult.

- Derek
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to