On 2/1/20, Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 01/02/2020 19:34, rcombs wrote: >> This issue has been argued before, with the status quo being preserved >> under >> the logic that the spec says this parameter is supposed to default to 1, >> and that we should follow the spec. The spec was misguided, and thus so >> was >> blindly following it. > > If "I don't agree with the spec" or "this spec does something stupid" were > valid > arguments, we may as well not have specs at all, and FFmpeg would have a lot > more > garbage in it. You can write at length why you think it's bad, but that does > not > negeate the fact that it's the spec, and the defacto way to handle decoding > AC-3. > > And I'd rather not give Dolby more ammunition for their anti-FOSS FUD > campaign. > > For whatever my opinion is worth nowadays on this list, it's a very, very > hard > NAK from me.
This does not have much logic or valid reasoning. > > - Derek > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
