On 6/25/2019 1:44 PM, Chris Cunningham wrote: > Friendly ping. > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 11:17 AM Chris Cunningham <chcunning...@chromium.org> > wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 9:13 AM James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2/26/2019 10:18 PM, Chris Cunningham wrote: >>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 4:46 PM Chris Cunningham >>>> <chcunning...@chromium.org <mailto:chcunning...@chromium.org>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm fine to do either. James, do you still prefer to skip the later >>>> headers if this breaks some old ogm files? >>>> >>>> >>>> James, friendly ping >>> >>> Yes, i'd prefer if we skip any superfluous parameter header that shows >>> up before the first data packet. >>> The return value of ff_codec_get_id() should also be checked to not >>> propagate AV_CODEC_ID_NONE, which was the source of this issue. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ffmpeg-devel mailing list >>> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org >>> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel >> >> >> Renewing request to apply for this patch. >> >> The alternate route of identifying/skipping the bad packets was more >> difficult than expected (https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/patch/13593/). >> James signed on this approach instead. >> >> Chris
Applied. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
